[quote=Ickest]OT: Breast feeding leads to polio and autism. Also, your child's leg will fall off.[/quote] Yeah not a viable answer when there's a vaccine for polio and when more mother's are going more formula based, yet more Autistic kids are born is increasing to what it was back 50 years and before.
I'm really glad most of this thread is actually aware breast-feeding is much better than "formula"... I expected to see a bunch of ignorant people saying "ewww".
It's advised to breastfeed a child first then later on give them bottled milk. (like when they get older.) The babies need their mother's nutrients first and blah blah blah.
Breast feeding. The baby receives natural antibodies from the mother that way. Also, there aren't any synthetic chemicals in breast milk that could effect the baby.
I'd advise on both. So much argument out there about which one is better, you can google it all and watch tv too, but it's not gonna be THAT big a deal.
Some argue breast feeding's much more beneficial and good for bonding. Bottle's suppose to be safer though. Especially if mother's sick or with inheritance disease/aids or something.
Go with both Get all excess breast milk out from pregnancy, then use the bottle/generic milk later.
...No, I'm not a girl/lady/woman/mother...I just know stuff.
Breast feeding... the child receives antibodies from the mother through her milk and protects it for at least 6 months. Plus, you know what you're getting instead of whatever a factory does. Natural is better, it's nature. But whatever floats your boat man.
18 Comments • Newest first
True
damn thats sad
[quote=Ickest]OT: Breast feeding leads to polio and autism. Also, your child's leg will fall off.[/quote]
Yeah not a viable answer when there's a vaccine for polio and when more mother's are going more formula based, yet more Autistic kids are born is increasing to what it was back 50 years and before.
Breast feeding is free. Bottle feeding is for betches who can't deal with a little snip on the nip every once in a while.
Breast feeding. Its healthier for the child.
I'm really glad most of this thread is actually aware breast-feeding is much better than "formula"... I expected to see a bunch of ignorant people saying "ewww".
It depends on the moms health.
It's advised to breastfeed a child first then later on give them bottled milk.
(like when they get older.)
The babies need their mother's nutrients first and blah blah blah.
Breast feeding.
The baby receives natural antibodies from the mother that way. Also, there aren't any synthetic chemicals in breast milk that could effect the baby.
[quote=holymage]Because there are doctors in Basilmarket[/quote]
this place aint yahoo answers boi
[quote=Dwarfmann]Out of all the places... why the hell would you ask basilmarket?[/quote]
Because there are doctors in Basilmarket
[quote=Ickest]Basil is the best place to ask this question because we're all doctors.
OT: Breast feeding leads to polio and autism. Also, your child's leg will fall off.[/quote]
So, its better not to breast feed but, why do people still do it :O
I'd advise on both.
So much argument out there about which one is better, you can google it all and watch tv too, but it's not gonna be THAT big a deal.
Some argue breast feeding's much more beneficial and good for bonding.
Bottle's suppose to be safer though. Especially if mother's sick or with inheritance disease/aids or something.
Go with both Get all excess breast milk out from pregnancy, then use the bottle/generic milk later.
...No, I'm not a girl/lady/woman/mother...I just know stuff.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OkcucXIuVI
it feels nice.
Breastfeeding is proven to be much more healthy for a child.
Breast feeding... the child receives antibodies from the mother through her milk and protects it for at least 6 months. Plus, you know what you're getting instead of whatever a factory does. Natural is better, it's nature. But whatever floats your boat man.
It depends on personal preference.