I realize people question how strong a class is, but realistically, the dps charts aren't accurate cause everyone has different funding. A well funded aran can be stronger than a poorly funded zero easily. It's also based on how players play, some people are bad at surviving meaning even I they are amazingly funded, they can't deal damage cause they keep dying or taking hits that slow them down, all while a poorly funded player could be dodging effectively and consistently dealing damage.
DPM wise, we are in the middle now. Even with little funding, we still triumph over Dawn Warriors and Hayatos. Demon Avengers will follow suit once you start edging towards the funded territory as not only do their HP dependent range scale poorly, but the 500k HP cap forces the more decorated players to rely only on ATT% to boost their range further.
It has always been unwise to choose an Aran if you wanted to maximize your bossing capabilities for the money; despite the numerous buffs, we are always categorized in the last quartile on the DPM charts. But if you consider the fact that we were literally the worst class to be at one time (post-Big Bang, pre-Chaos), tis all gud.
Why not put this in Aran section? Then again that would be more biased opinions...
In my opinion, yes totally biased, Aran was never the worse warrior, good damage, speed, range, versatility, survivability, horizontal mobility with bad vertical mobility, low HP, and problems stopping an attack at times.
9 Comments • Newest first
We are ok, we just become jelly seeing all the other classes being op af coughkaisercoughzerocough
Well even without the dps chart, people still say aran is weak O_O.
We hit big numbers with lower range.
DPS charts say we're low but we hit so hard it doesn't really even matter.
I realize people question how strong a class is, but realistically, the dps charts aren't accurate cause everyone has different funding. A well funded aran can be stronger than a poorly funded zero easily. It's also based on how players play, some people are bad at surviving meaning even I they are amazingly funded, they can't deal damage cause they keep dying or taking hits that slow them down, all while a poorly funded player could be dodging effectively and consistently dealing damage.
DPM wise, we are in the middle now.
Even with little funding, we still triumph over Dawn Warriors and Hayatos. Demon Avengers will follow suit once you start edging towards the funded territory as not only do their HP dependent range scale poorly, but the 500k HP cap forces the more decorated players to rely only on ATT% to boost their range further.
It has always been unwise to choose an Aran if you wanted to maximize your bossing capabilities for the money; despite the numerous buffs, we are always categorized in the last quartile on the DPM charts. But if you consider the fact that we were literally the worst class to be at one time (post-Big Bang, pre-Chaos), tis all gud.
Why not put this in Aran section? Then again that would be more biased opinions...
In my opinion, yes totally biased, Aran was never the worse warrior, good damage, speed, range, versatility, survivability, horizontal mobility with bad vertical mobility, low HP, and problems stopping an attack at times.
still hear hayato is better than aran -.-
[quote=healer55]is Aran still the worst warrior after v.150 buffs?[/quote]
Because Hayato isnt a warrior.
We're not a warrior
We're a hero.
OHHHHHH