Is it even worth converting to low dex?
Well, i have this lvl 91 dexless hermit.
And, it has a 66 att 3 lined skanda.
I was wondering if i should convert because,
1. I cannot afford % luk equips, nor am i able to cube.
2. My damage range is 1326-2568 clean, which i find is decent for my level.
3.I cannot get a craven that is higher than 73+ attack.
4. By my calculations, i will have a 1602-3054 range CLEAN by the time i am a nightlord.
EDIT Also, why is it that. This level 110 hermit with the SAME EXACT damage range as my hermit do more damage than me at high level bosses(manon,griffey etc)
November 14, 2010
2 Comments • Newest first
at BB it's better off being lowdex then dex less, i'll repeat:
"[i]this is due to a new formula for big bang, practically "2.00*(4 * LUK + DEX) * (Weapon Attack / 100) ", so in other words no matter how much DEX you have it is all the same, because it is combining the two primary stats for a sin (LUK + DEX) together, however with %LUK eqps, people are switching to low dex as that it will benefit more (able to wear higher lvl eqps = better potentials).[/i]"
since the new base is LUK+DEX instead of just LUK, it'll make no difference whether your dexless. instead dexless will have flaws, with their being an unbalanced damage range, as well as not being able to wear higher lvl eqps case yo ever DO have the funds for good %LUK potentials.
and i'm guessing the sin may have 30%boss damage on his claw if you both have the exact same range
the hermit that has the same damage range MIGHT have a % boss damage weapon maybe?