Super Smash Brothers Brawl
http://www.1up.com/news/masahiro-sakurai-reflects-super-smash
EAT IT!
Sakurai admitted Melee is a better competitive game than Brawl. He admitted Melee had more options. [b]He admitted he made brawl for noobs[/b]
[i]"Melee is the sharpest game in the series," he wrote. "It's pretty speedy all around and asks a lot of your coordination skills. Fans of the first Smash Bros. got into it quickly, and it just felt really good to play."[/i]
[i]"I had created Smash Bros. to be my response to how hardcore-exclusive the fighting game genre had become over the years," [/i]
[i]"If we want new people from this generation of gamers to come in," he concluded, "then we need it accessible, simple, and playable by anyone. [/i]
That shows he purposely "dumbed down" brawl lolololol
12 Comments • Newest first
[quote=Face]I prefer Brawl over Melee because Brawl is a bit more balanced, Melee is only fun when I play as characters like, Marth, Roy, Link. In Melee it seems like fast paced sword characters tend to have a better fighting chance.[/quote]
Actually Zach, melee is more balanced than brawl. Surprising, but it's true xD
But... In brawl, you can make Mario fight Sonic!
And you have Ike: "Prepare Yourself!" "I fight for my friends"
And... Those are the best parts about brawl.
It'd be cool if they made a game more like melee except with more characters... *sigh*
That doesn't make Melee a better game.
n64 smash bros > all
TAKE THAT!
Now aznseal can back up the reasons why they don't play brawl.
[quote=Travis2]>Implying you're opinion is not an opinion.[/quote]
My opinions came from the creator himself.
I like both so it doesn't really matter to me.
You make it sound as if you aren't a pro, you're a "noob"...
This would matter, say, if it was 2008 when Brawl was released.
Unfortunately it's almost 2011, and the amount of people who care about this has severely dwindled.
Brawl sucks.
I care so much, let me write it in my journel.
dont care?