General

is absolute ring a must have ring?

At what rank is it in out of all rings? I think besides godly cubed rings, absolute should come 2nd..
And at what price will it be buying or selling at?

July 12, 2013

30 Comments • Newest first

Blargh89

Absolute ring is a must have for some reasons:

-It's completely trade-able, unlike most if not all of the 3rd tier potential rings that get locked upon equipping, which means you have a great ring for all your characters.
-Practically no money required to get it to an usable state, once again the 3rd tier pot rings need some cubing done to get main stat %.
-It's also free, no money needed at all to obtain it.

Reply July 13, 2013
tenseiga1

You're gonna want to ignore that guy.
Always only talking about items that super funded people buy, and ignores the 99.999999999% of players who don't bother with those items.
If you ask for something like the cheapest reliable car, he'll list top of the brand models. He needs to head desk hard a lot.
And his post are 99% too long, don't bother reading them.

Reply July 13, 2013
iceychill2

[quote=Kazdan][HELP]

Can I equip 2013 Evolving Ring I + 2013 Evolving Ring II + 2013 Evolving Ring III + Absolute Ring together?[/quote]

no. either all 3 or just the absolute.

Reply July 13, 2013
bluebomber24

@Ouhai: Guess you didn't read the first page. and with bonus potential, you don't need a godly cubed ring for some of those rings. Also, an LGR beats an Absolute when its un-godly cubed.

@kiue Bonus potential

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Ouhai

@bluebomber24

Actually, he didn't even ASK for you to list all the pottable rings.

He said what place is the Absolute ring AGAINST NON godly cubed rings

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Green4EVER

It depends on your funding, honestly. If you can afford to have 4 3rd tier rings with Epic or higher potential, obviously that is going to be the better option, but if you're limited on funding it is one of the better rings for you.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
bluebomber24

@Ouhai: He asked for what rings are pottable. I could care less, about the requirements to obtain/beat an absolute ring.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
alvintheazn

Don't forget that the adventurer critical ring is better too, for those who have it.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
El6e

[quote=tim777]How? Absolute Ring is much better than LGR if it had no potential[/quote]
Lgr gives a 16 att/matt buff to the user when you equip it like Angelic blessings

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Ouhai

[quote=bluebomber24]Potables:
Lgr
Jewel
Berserker set (2)
Pinnacle
Tempest
Unleashed
Secret
Job Specific (I.e. Nova rings)
Wedding rings?
That Cygnus ring?

Absolute can get beat by all of those.[/quote]

-Lol good luck getting that if you're not rich
-Obselete event, untradeable
-good luck crafting it or buying it
-Eh, not that bad too find
-Same as above
-Same as above
-Eh?
-Nova rings are only for Nova
-lol nx required
-barely exists lol

Then add the fact you have to cube the hell out of the rings for them to even be remotely decent (except the LGR but again, lol you need to be a rich mofo)

Therefore, an absolute rings is definetely a ring that can last you for quite sometime before becoming obsolete.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Valued

[quote=bluebomber24]Potables:
Lgr
Jewel
Berserker set (2)
Pinnacle
Tempest
Unleashed
Secret
Job Specific (I.e. Nova rings)
Wedding rings?
That Cygnus ring?

Absolute can get beat by all of those.[/quote]

by cygnus ring do you mean the cygnus kihoor ring or something?
its only 5atk and unpottable f.y.i

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
zEric7x

Its better than two of the rings I am wearing right now. I have a S ring from a event and I can replace that or my evolving 3 ring.
The other rings I have are a tempest ring with 9% STR and a critical ring.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Jaulian

Well, its probs one of the best rings for avg/un-funded people, since normal peeps can't really get some of the potted rings, they can't cube it to a good enough pot, or they don't have enough % stat to make the potted rings make a big enough difference. So for most people, it is the best ring in the game, for the rich, nope.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
dragon2923

[quote=Kazdan][HELP]

Can I equip 2013 Evolving Ring I + 2013 Evolving Ring II + 2013 Evolving Ring III + Absolute Ring together?[/quote]

brb time machine.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Kazdan

[HELP]

Can I equip 2013 Evolving Ring I + 2013 Evolving Ring II + 2013 Evolving Ring III + Absolute Ring together?

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
Rogue

If you can get Tempest ring, unleashed ring, and 2 guardian rings then the absolute ring is pointless.

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
HastyHeist

for broke noobs, yeah

Reply July 13, 2013 - edited
tim777

[quote=thedicer]Thunder god ring, before potential is better than absolute ring.[/quote]

How? Absolute Ring is much better than LGR if it had no potential

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
narubaka13

@TheNutCracker: Whut? o___o
I'm pretty sure Evo Ring 1 has 5 atk/matk as well.
I was just saying that the Abs Ring(lol abs.) would be the same as the Evo rings in regard to not being able to gain potential.

3 Evo rings would only be better in the situation that you're unfunded, otherwise you can easily replace Evo Rings 1 and 2 with some good %stat rings, and use Evo Ring 3 and Abs Ring instead.
Otherwise you'd be wasting 2 slots just to get 5 more attack.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
Marceaux

I want it but at the same time I'm too lazy

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
narubaka13

[quote=sher1412]Can anyone confirm that the (final) absolute ring is non-pottable?
Screenshot or something would be nice.[/quote]

It's basically the same as the Evolving Rings...
Plus there's no slot.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
sher1412

Can anyone confirm that the (final) absolute ring is non-pottable?
Screenshot or something would be nice.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
kiue

Absolute Ring isn't that bad. For my Night Lord, 15attack = 9% Luk including the fact that their is also +18allstat which will make that 9% => ~11%.

It is the great ring for people who doesn't pay lots and lots of $$$$$$$. It would save me a huge amount of meso not buying the extra potential'ed ring.

If you are just aiming for decent'y high damage, 9% on all the rings are good enough. So with the current rings out right now if you dont have a lot of funding.:

Tempest Ring, That new ring in shop, Pinnacle, and Absolute is good enough.

Edit:
@bluebomber24 Berserk rings are pottable but unless you get more than a certain amount of %, and in my case 9-11%ish, the berserk rings are actually weaker than Absolute Ring. Unless you get the set to get the extra 10 attack and like 9%+ on each then berserk is better.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
bluebomber24

Potables:
Lgr
Jewel
Berserker set (2)
Pinnacle
Tempest
Unleashed
Secret
Job Specific (I.e. Nova rings)
Wedding rings?
That Cygnus ring?

Absolute can get beat by all of those.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
CygnusBabii

Nope lol It's simply a waste of time.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
chelvan

Tempest, unleash what other rings r pottable

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
thedicer

[quote=tim777]Absolute ring is the best non-potential ring[/quote]

Thunder god ring, before potential is better than absolute ring.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
enoch129

If you can get 4 lvl 70+ pottable rings, no. If not, absolutely.

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited
tim777

Absolute ring is the best non-potential ring

Reply July 12, 2013 - edited