General

Mage

Are Battle Mages stronger then Evans?

I still haven't made an Evan yet but I want to know if Battle Mages are better, or stronger. Which ones have better skills?

December 29, 2010

14 Comments • Newest first

urdad9939

I love BMs simply cuz of Dark chains and our critical hits =D

Reply January 1, 2011
Chema

Why people keep saying evans are slower than BaMs?
BaMs take quite some time shaking like a retard with QuadBlow+

Reply January 1, 2011
jeff12

I'll go with Evans, Battle Mages have less skills.

Reply December 31, 2010
yoshi847

Bams r beast at bossing early
and evans r just fun =) cuz u get new skills get 10 or 20 lvls

Reply December 30, 2010
MangosOnTheWeb

Evans are way more fun, and are one of the most powerful classes in the game (not DPS, just by the numbers). But they attack slowly, at least in the beginning, and you need lik 10k NX to get Magic guard and other skills. Otherwise you die easily. Really easily. And their Magic Guard only guards 70% HP for 300 seconds.

Reply December 29, 2010
justsofly

[quote=kalabazin]Evans attack SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW, and they're just boring .-.[/quote]

You clearly do not have the patience.

Anyway I prefer my Evan over my BaM, but I just like mages overall.

Evans get varying skills and elements and we also have a few nice buffs, high powered attacks but slow.

BaMs are also fun,weak at first but they get alot stronger towards advancements and they are indeed much faster.

You'd actually have to have them both at their peak levels to fully determine which is better. Speed however, evans cannot match a BaM in.

Btw I have a BaM lvl 51 and currently my evan is lvl 122 (lvled today). Oh and of course funding matters.

Reply December 29, 2010
xDracius

[quote=BBisUnbalance]Evans are way too overpowered - and they do not attack slow - trust me i have a 130+ I/L and i could never defend my map at gallos (back when it was KS central because of them giving 2.5k EXP for only 50k HP)[/quote]

Slowness for 100 levels.
You gotta admit, they got perserverance.

Reply December 29, 2010
alexmjakway2

[quote=Hiro]You have to pay real money to use Evans fully, so no.[/quote]

I never paid. I did surveys. Anywho, Evan better in my opinion.

Reply December 29, 2010
kalabazin

Evans attack SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW, and they're just boring .-.

Reply December 29, 2010
BBisUnbalance

Evans are way too overpowered - and they do not attack slow - trust me i have a 130+ I/L and i could never defend my map at gallos (back when it was KS central because of them giving 2.5k EXP for only 50k HP)

Reply December 29, 2010
jeff12

Oh...Ok...I'll go with Evans

Reply December 29, 2010
Lugiaman64

BaMs are more wanted in parties because of their auras but I personally like Evans more. BaMs basically use the same skill from 10-200. Every job advance just increases the amount of hits of it. Evans get alot of cool and unique skills such as recovery aura and phantom imprint.

Reply December 29, 2010
xDracius

In terms of raw damage, Battle Mages are stronger.

At level 100 though, Evans are very, very good.
At training, due to Earthquake.

Reply December 29, 2010
Narutards

I would have to go with BaMs, because I personally couldn't make it to the level where Evans FINALLY get booster. Evans attack slow as hell till I think around 70.

Reply December 29, 2010