Video

[quote=GunPowder]Hey, Ted

Read [URL=http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=71974&page=2]Takerbackers post[/URL].

From my past experience, and even in this video, changing channels did change the pool of potential lines.

Also, these [URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLoeyY_8wIA]Selective Miracle Cubes[/URL] EMS has, further support this theory.[/quote]

I'll have a look, thanks!

[quote=Erag0n1]Never thought of nexon going about it that way although it makes sense since they have to alter it for double miracle times anyway.
I kinda assume everything involves %'ages is as shady as vegas casinos anyway.

Gz on the final result but dang that took a LOT of cubes.[/quote]

Yeah, I was actually surprised when I noticed my video is over 15 minutes long, and I was thinking about cutting some of the cubing attempts.
At the end, I decided to keep all footage, as I wanted people to see how many useless lines bonus potential has, and to think twice before recubing something decent.

Never thought of nexon going about it that way although it makes sense since they have to alter it for double miracle times anyway.
I kinda assume everything involves %'ages is as shady as vegas casinos anyway.

Gz on the final result but dang that took a LOT of cubes.

[quote=Simfel]"CCing changes the pool of potential lines"

May or may not be the first time I've heard this, but never supported with any evidence. Do you have any official statements or rigorous tests that back this up? Would be a useful trick if it's true o-o[/quote]
Hey, Ted

Read [URL=http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=71974&page=2]Takerbackers post[/URL].

From my past experience, and even in this video, changing channels did change the pool of potential lines.

Also, these [URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLoeyY_8wIA]Selective Miracle Cubes[/URL] EMS has, further support this theory.

"CCing changes the pool of potential lines"

May or may not be the first time I've heard this, but never supported with any evidence. Do you have any official statements or rigorous tests that back this up? Would be a useful trick if it's true o-o