General

ImCensored the Pally/Hero? How are you gonna now? D:

Paladins are stupid now in my opinion.
It's up to you mayne.
They're both pretty cool, though I reckon Hero is more fun.

hi man u may not be the hero gms wants but u will be the 1 it needs ok?

Paladins are amazing compared to heroes.

at 125 on a hero I was hitting 125k with raging blow.

At 125 on a paladin I was hitting 600-700k with lightning charge.

Same number of hits.

Heros are really good bossers tbh. They don't have much range compared to the other warrior but as a previous basiler mention their damage output is insane. They're also not really good mobbers compared to others but that doesn't stop them.. What to play all comes down to preference just play both and then decide. If not go on youtube and watch some videos of both class.

@bblan7787: Heroes have puncture, combo chain move (scorpion from mk's "get over here" move), and panic. Oh to add on, they also have shout which I doubt many people use, but it's a nice move and should be used more before it's taken away like dragon roar for dk's T.T

[quote=mvietp09]I say go hero cause they are definitely more of a challenge to play. Pallies are great if you don't like to pot and want to deal tons of damage thanks to elemental resist ignore, but they are actually pretty dull. All 5 of our attacks basically have the same animation and basically do the same thing, damage (none of our status inflictions really even do anything useful when you're at higher lvl/range). I guess essentially the idea is if you want to be strong with boron gameplay, go pally, if you don't mind being weak and enjoy a challenging gameplay, go hero.[/quote]

pally have 5 attacks with the same animation well hero's have 1 attack with the same animation. Well it doesn't matter anymore I like to juggle between the 3 I have a sword and a spear

Sean um there are other factors as well such as pallies can go over the max defence of 9999 due to shield mastery i think. Though hero's harder to fund since some people have complained in the past about their hero and (insert class here) have the same range with their other class dealing more damage despite same range. Pros of hero=aca boss rush thats essentially a free 2% boss per orb. Advantageous of Pallies=Resurrection skill, the invincibility hyper skill @WhoMomma1 I disagree I spent more on mp potions then on hero just spamming elemental charges alone.

Paladin because Heroes brings pointless party skills to party and you'll chug potions like no tmrw.

Hero is like 1/3 the range of Drk, but it has so much raw damage.
Like once you switch you'll see your range just drop.
Hero is hard mode.
But at least we're decent bossers.

How much weaker is hero compared to dk now? I'm considering switching over.

I say go hero cause they are definitely more of a challenge to play. Pallies are great if you don't like to pot and want to deal tons of damage thanks to elemental resist ignore, but they are actually pretty dull. All 5 of our attacks basically have the same animation and basically do the same thing, damage (none of our status inflictions really even do anything useful when you're at higher lvl/range). I guess essentially the idea is if you want to be strong with boron gameplay, go pally, if you don't mind being weak and enjoy a challenging gameplay, go hero.

If you plan to play that character for the long run, go hero as paladins will get nerfed. I personally enjoyed paladins though as it's not a one-key-does-all type of class

If you have both classes, why not just try them both?
Anyways IMO I like Paladin better, because they never ever get hit which is manly af.
Not to mention they're really strong bossers.

If you have three coins, why not just play through both?

Pally Pally Pally

No encroaching upon my territory D: