General

Bowman

Final Attack doesnt active with StrafeUltimate Strafe

Ultimate Strafe/Strafe don't have tags for finalAttack in the data on them so they don't activate FA. The funny part about this is that Bowmaster's strafe does in fact activate FA. This isn't a bug since this is also how it is in kMS.

September 27, 2011

32 Comments • Newest first

Rapptz

[quote=ChaosConsumd]Uhhh I've seen it activate alot while using U.S.[/quote]

This is post-jump/ascension. Not post-Chaos.

Reply September 28, 2011
Fcroaonlk

@Rapptz: What does that have to do with Ultimate Blizzard? If you don't like the fact that BM's are better at 1v1, at least acknowledge the fact that ultimate inferno is inferior to Pierce. We still get quite good buffs

Reply September 28, 2011
AckarRed

[quote=Rapptz]Strafe has 3100001 as Final Attack, which is Final Attack: Bow.
3200001 is Final Attack: Crossbow. It lacks this.[/quote]

Looks like one typo left from Tespia. Best if you reported this to Nexon.

Reply September 28, 2011
darklord666

[quote=bluebomber24]REALLY no more attack limit...YES!

On the Marksman thing, I think I will need some proof. To hard for me to believe.[/quote]

Ya, that^ and @TS, there could be glitches in KMS too ya know

Reply September 28, 2011
Rapptz

[quote=AckarRed]I relooked Strafe on Repacker, the finalattack tag is there. Not the same for Ultimate Strafe.[/quote]

Strafe has 3100001 as Final Attack, which is Final Attack: Bow.
3200001 is Final Attack: Crossbow. It lacks this.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
AckarRed

I relooked Strafe on Repacker, the finalattack tag is there. Not the same for Ultimate Strafe.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
MangosOnTheWeb

@Rapptz: That solves that issue, but you only did strafe.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
MangosOnTheWeb

[quote=Rapptz]Is video proof more acceptable?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GQjCIdmSe8[/quote]

What version of KMS is that? And you didn't test Ultimate Strafe. If it doesn't activate when I test (pre patched already), I'll going to explode.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
huy123

It creates a barrier of 1v1 and mob. I mean if you prefer mob it's mm. 1v1 is bm. It's strange how they take it out but even so, it might be due to the fact that mm don't have adv fa

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
bluebomber24

[quote=Darkknight316]Wow. Bad news. Fortunately FA isn't THAT important for us anyway, but still. So...do we max Eagle instead of FA now?[/quote]

I would still max FA just in case Nexon pretends to say it was a glitch that they "just" noticed.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
Thenubbies

[quote=BigBossBeoulve]If you want to 1v1 go make a BM =_= also if BMs wanted to mob we could have made a MM, dont whine about not having such a good 1v1, US is good enough.[/quote]

Following your logic then why did BMs get U. Inferno? Lol

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
darklime

Maybe it doesn't work with Strafe but it works with Ultimate Strafe?
And if it doesn't, then Nexon has given MM a cruel joke.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
tecul1

Wait, really? Where'd you get the extractions from? Not that this is something totally out f Nexon's ballpark, though.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
Rapptz

[quote=BigBossBeoulve]If you want to 1v1 go make a BM =_= also if BMs wanted to mob we could have made a MM, dont whine about not having such a good 1v1, US is good enough.[/quote]

I am a bowmaster.
Thank you for your concern though. I'm just giving a heads up to all my Archer subclass people.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
airforce1

This would be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic and undoubtedly won't be fixed. LF>Nexon to actually fix glitches instead of pushing new content

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
bluebomber24

Well, it may be one of those glitches that last a long time until Nexon fixes it years later like Shadow Partner. Or...the other path is that its not a glitch and Nexon thinks MMs should stick to mobbing.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
bluebomber24

[quote=Rapptz]@bluebomber24:

http://i.imgur.com/YFVIN.png[/quote]

But...but...this defies all logic. I mean it sounds so much like a bug than intentional, but if it is intentional, I for once do not understand Nexons choice.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
Rapptz

[quote=DragunBaine]Even with the evidence right there that I haven't clicked on, it's REALLY hard to believe that we're gonna get a skill that won't activate and NOT have it be a bug. I mean, nexon's not THAT cruel.[/quote]

Is video proof more acceptable?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GQjCIdmSe8

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
bluebomber24

[quote=Rapptz]@Glamophonic: Yes, this is post-jump.
@gizzie: Bowmaster's had their 100 attack limit for FA removed and it still works with hurricane.[/quote]

REALLY no more attack limit...YES!

On the Marksman thing, I think I will need some proof. To hard for me to believe.

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
NineCrimes

@fcroanlk: I was mostly not serious.
@rapptz: It's not like FA even does that much for MM anyway

Reply September 28, 2011 - edited
Rapptz

[quote=Fcroaonlk]@tastymsg: Is that a joke? No ultimate Blizzard? We've got pierce buffed to %1500 0.o[/quote]

In exchange of your 1v1 suffering though?

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
Fcroaonlk

@tastymsg: Is that a joke? No ultimate Blizzard? We've got pierce buffed to %1500 0.o

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
NineCrimes

Why do they even give us FA then?

Ugh. No FA? No AFA? No Ultimate Blizz?

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
Rapptz

@NineCrimes: Yeah really.
@Thenubbies: The only other choice is Eagle, but Frostprey replaces that anyway.

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
Thenubbies

So theres no point for Final Attack for crossbows?

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
NineCrimes

Wait really?

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
blazi4ever

Well isn't this fair? :L

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
ImZelkova

Glad you helped me choose to be a BM.

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited
Rapptz

@Glamophonic: Yes, this is post-jump.
@gizzie: Bowmaster's had their 100 attack limit for FA removed and it still works with hurricane.

Reply September 27, 2011 - edited