General

Chat

Teachers that dont actually teach?

So for science we have to answer questions from the text book I and just noticed that my
science teacher doesn't really teach. Anyone can assign us homework to read a chapter from the book and
answer the questions, but only some teachers can make up labs that actually involves material and'
makes the students actually understands it. Do you guys have teachers that don't actually teach and just
make you read the chapter?

September 25, 2012

20 Comments • Newest first

DrHye

[quote=Ecoutie]Part of the problem with what you're describing is not all teachers have the time to give each student that one-on-one individualized help where verbal communication can really be effective. (With lectures it's usually a hit or miss, especially if pressed for time.) I find that a lot of my peers give up too easily and do not even know how to try to do work or read a book on their own. For me personally, the best way to learn something is to read before class, work out problems on my own, then approach someone else (internet, professor, tutor etc.) for help. Then do more problems. Rather than viewing the text as a guideline, I view it as the journey. Teachers, peers, tutors, & other resources can all help give you pointers along the way and keep you moving forward if you get stuck. To get to the end it ultimately requires lots of practice and learning to reach out for help when you need it (preferably not the night before an exam). Yes text books are often considered quite boring but the people with the skills required to self-teach and ask for help with necessary will go farther than those who sit and QQ or wait to be spoon fed material.

And to OP if your teacher AND your book aren't explaining concepts in an understandable way, look for other resources. If you're still in high school Khan Academy might have a video covering the topic you're trying to learn. If not, ask around for resources that are applicable to you. I'm sorry your teacher "sucks" but don't dwell too long. Think: Challenge Accepted. [/quote]

The debate's been black and white: teaching or text, not the combination of both, because obviously if you take the best of both worlds, you will be expected to be better off than anyone who only focuses on one method of learning material.
However, I believe you're exaggerating the press for time teachers have in high school or college. Even though they're not teaching individually during lectures, they always make sure to ask if any parts are unclear (an therefore have time to clear them). And to add to that, teachers in high school or college both make or can make time to meet individually for personalized tutoring. Furthermore, there's usually a way or two to explain ideas that the majority of a group will understand above the wording of the text, but if some don't follow, that's why the contact the teacher for extra help if necessary.
And to finalize, if I haven't said it yet (and I won't check because typing on this phone has been a nightmare this whole time), I agree that anyone who can teach themselves through use of the textbook or other sources available today will have an easier time learning future lessons and will have a stronger mind. My argument is that a lecture or live teaching is more effective at explaining information to a student than a book. But a student who can use a more challenging resource and still be successful is better off than one who cannot do so.

That should have explained my whole side pretty clearly. If not, I can try again at a later time because right now I am ready to kill this phone.

Reply September 25, 2012
Ecoutie

[quote=DrHye]That's because the textbook is the guideline for what must be taught to the class for that semester. But I want to pose this example: try teaching someone some complex concept regarding graphs. It can be done by book, but it's much easier to teach in person where you can point and slide your fingers across the graph and speak simultaneously. The book has text set in stone. If the student doesn't understand the text (edit: including the still and uneditable pictures) given, and repetition doesn't help, that's too bad. Teachers, professors and even tutors can attempt this again and again using different wording, constantly trying new ways to speak the student's language until you hear the classic "Ohhhh!"

The combination of verbal communication and physial gestures and physical props make live teaching a clearly more effective method of sharing knowledge than a textbook. The biggest benefit a book has over a lecture is that you have it forever, but even that can be combated against with a video camera, YouTube, or other technologies of today

Now for things like history, I'd usually agree with you and just memorize the text because it's all facts after facts, but as a math tutor, there's been cases where it's undeniable that the live help with the factors I mentioned above are more successful than reading the book. In geometry, I can cut out shapes to match the problem, break them down into pieces and make sense out of it with a student. For graphs, I kinda already explained that. But I think you get where I'm coming from now[/quote]

Part of the problem with what you're describing is not all teachers have the time to give each student that one-on-one individualized help where verbal communication can really be effective. (With lectures it's usually a hit or miss, especially if pressed for time.) I find that a lot of my peers give up too easily and do not even know how to try to do work or read a book on their own. For me personally, the best way to learn something is to read before class, work out problems on my own, then approach someone else (internet, professor, tutor etc.) for help. Then do more problems. Rather than viewing the text as a guideline, I view it as the journey. Teachers, peers, tutors, & other resources can all help give you pointers along the way and keep you moving forward if you get stuck. To get to the end it ultimately requires lots of practice and learning to reach out for help when you need it (preferably not the night before an exam). Yes text books are often considered quite boring but the people with the skills required to self-teach and ask for help with necessary will go farther than those who sit and QQ or wait to be spoon fed material.

And to OP if your teacher AND your book aren't explaining concepts in an understandable way, look for other resources. If you're still in high school Khan Academy might have a video covering the topic you're trying to learn. If not, ask around for resources that are applicable to you. I'm sorry your teacher "sucks" but don't dwell too long. Think: Challenge Accepted.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
DrHye

[quote=TheDudeAbides]Oh yeah don't get me wrong I'm definitely not arguing that it's a good way to run a class, just saying I've taken and finished 10 courses, and am doing 5 more now and they have all been identical in that they are just lectures of what's in the textbooks. I'm just saying to the OP, yea your high school guy just quotes the textbook, well I pay $2000 a semester for some guy to quote me a textbook too.[/quote]

That's because the textbook is the guideline for what must be taught to the class for that semester. But I want to pose this example: try teaching someone some complex concept regarding graphs. It can be done by book, but it's much easier to teach in person where you can point and slide your fingers across the graph and speak simultaneously. The book has text set in stone. If the student doesn't understand the text (edit: including the still and uneditable pictures) given, and repetition doesn't help, that's too bad. Teachers, professors and even tutors can attempt this again and again using different wording, constantly trying new ways to speak the student's language until you hear the classic "Ohhhh!"

The combination of verbal communication and physial gestures and physical props make live teaching a clearly more effective method of sharing knowledge than a textbook. The biggest benefit a book has over a lecture is that you have it forever, but even that can be combated against with a video camera, YouTube, or other technologies of today

Now for things like history, I'd usually agree with you and just memorize the text because it's all facts after facts, but as a math tutor, there's been cases where it's undeniable that the live help with the factors I mentioned above are more successful than reading the book. In geometry, I can cut out shapes to match the problem, break them down into pieces and make sense out of it with a student. For graphs, I kinda already explained that. But I think you get where I'm coming from now

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
TheDudeAbides

[quote=DrHye]
@ above: I still think there are many classes where a professor teaching the information is more effective than reading, even though sooner or later both will teach the same things. But books don't teach the same way professors can, nor can they use three-dimensional visual aids. If you're fine with only the book in every class, more power to you, but that's not the norm.[/quote]

Oh yeah don't get me wrong I'm definitely not arguing that it's a good way to run a class, just saying I've taken and finished 10 courses, and am doing 5 more now and they have all been identical in that they are just lectures of what's in the textbooks. I'm just saying to the OP, yea your high school guy just quotes the textbook, well I pay $2000 a semester for some guy to quote me a textbook too.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
DrHye

@aznseal: Yeah, many classes don't really need teaching if it's just facts after facts. But for things like certain math or math-related science classes or more conceptual stuff, the professor is usually a very good help and teaches better than the book. The book is almost always a good study tool, but teachers can answer specific questions using explanations a book might not have.

@Oncall: In the cases where attendance isn't mandatory and it's not a test/quiz day, why do people go at all?

@ above: I still think there are many classes where a professor teaching the information is more effective than reading, even though sooner or later both will teach the same things. But books don't teach the same way professors can, nor can they use three-dimensional visual aids. If you're fine with only the book in every class, more power to you, but that's not the norm.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
TheDudeAbides

[quote=DrHye]If the teachings weren't more successful than reading the books, no one would show up to lectures. There's an obvious difference between teaching material found in the book and simply reading off it. Honestly, how can you even think that professors teaching the material is no better than reading the book yourself? There's a time for both, but relying only on the book makes it way more difficult in many classes.[/quote]

I can think that way because I've lived it. I'm in my second year of university and can count the number of classes Ive been too on my hands and toes, including exams, and I'm doing just fine.
First year I attend classes for a bit before I figured out everything was just a regurgitation of the textbooks. To succeed all you really need to do is keep up with the readings.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
downonu

last year my homeroom teacher wuld giv us geography test with a atlis under our desk and he wuld leave the room for 10 to 15 minutes at a time. when he was in there he was facing his computer and thats why i got A 's in that class

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
aznseal

[quote=DrHye]If the teachings weren't more successful than reading the books, no one would show up to lectures. There's an obvious difference between teaching material found in the book and simply reading off it. Honestly, how can you even think that professors teaching the material is no better than reading the book yourself? There's a time for both, but relying only on the book makes it way more difficult in many classes.[/quote]

Actually it depends on person I guess.

For me, I usually have to go to lecture to be able to do well in my history/philosophy/non-science courses but I usually do well enough in science by just tryharding the book.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
NonSonoFronz

The only teacher I really ever had like that was my Honors Chemistry teacher.

Since then, all of my teacher have been wonderful.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
DrHye

[quote=TheDudeAbides]just going off of what the op said. His teacher reads right from the text book and takes questions right from the textbook. That's all that happens in university. You get dictated the textbook then you go home and read the textbook some more.[/quote]

If the teachings weren't more successful than reading the books, no one would show up to lectures. There's an obvious difference between teaching material found in the book and simply reading off it. Honestly, how can you even think that professors teaching the material is no better than reading the book yourself? There's a time for both, but relying only on the book makes it way more difficult in many classes.

Maybe I sound crazy to you, but almost ALL of my professors were genuinely motivated to teach us what we had to learn in a quality manner. I can only think of one that was kind of an oddball.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
aeroarrowlol

Thats what happened in my chem class last year. The teacher gave me a 70, but I think I deserved a 60 at best!
I'm so screwed this semester in gr12chem

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
aznseal

every single class in college is pretty much like this because research>>>>>teaching in a lot of professors' minds

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
Ecarina

10th grade geometry teacher >.> same with my 10th grade bio teacher (i slept in class and got a 91%, like i literally thought of it as naptime)

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
TheDudeAbides

[quote=DrHye]How would a professor not teach during a designated lecture period? It's not like a classroom. It's a lecture hall. They do nothing but talk the majority of the time[/quote]

just going off of what the op said. His teacher reads right from the text book and takes questions right from the textbook. That's all that happens in university. You get dictated the textbook then you go home and read the textbook some more.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
sl3athOwl

My chem teacher could be replaced by a xerox printer and a tape recorder that says "don't set yourself on fire"

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
DrHye

[quote=TheDudeAbides]sounds like university[/quote]

How would a professor not teach during a designated lecture period? It's not like a classroom. It's a lecture hall. They do nothing but talk the majority of the time

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
Laker1294

Math teacher 11th grade.

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
siuttybears

Math teacher most important course for me

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
TheDudeAbides

sounds like university

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited
RazorNion

If they don't do actual work, that means they don't check your work, right?

Reply September 25, 2012 - edited