General

Avoidability Question, Warning Really Dumb Question

Okay so as stated in the title, it's really dumb and no one knows why ANYONE would do anything like this but does anyone know how much Avoidability/% Avoid, however it's calculated as, you would need to be able to dodge pretty much all attacks. If it's not possible to dodge ALL attacks (I don't know but for instance Magic Attacks which I actually think can be dodged) how much you would need to avoid most would be the next best thing. Was just wondering, might make a Dual Blade for just full Avoid for the lulz, don't judge please.

November 4, 2012

8 Comments • Newest first

CaptCandy

I heard that it is sqrt(Your Avoidability) - sqrt (Monster's accuracy), but I'm not quite sure.

Reply November 4, 2012
alltwo147

[quote=Eaglesmash56]Yea DB's receive about a 70% dodge chance from multiple skills, along with a high base avoid[/quote]

Oh, thanks.

Reply November 4, 2012
Eaglesmash56

[quote=alltwo147]So, why is it that Dual Blades can avoid so much? Is it due to a certain skill?[/quote]

Yea DB's receive about a 70% dodge chance from multiple skills, along with a high base avoid

Reply November 4, 2012
alltwo147

So, why is it that Dual Blades can avoid so much? Is it due to a certain skill?

Reply November 4, 2012
mumbhaki

5k avoid is good enough

Reply November 4, 2012
reedpipes

[quote=SwordArtOnlineB]4000+ is pretty safe, 7000+ to avoid ANYTHING.[/quote]

nah when empress potential locked me, I had 2k avoid. She was able to attack me only once every 50 times or so, which is basically godmode. However, when i'm not in pot lock, I have 8.8k avoid and nothing at all hits me. NOTHING

Reply November 4, 2012
FightFightFight

Yeah but the question is HOW MUCH avoid would you need? Like would you need help from extra potentials and stuff? a rough estimation would be good too

Reply November 4, 2012
lukiie

[quote=KillerKing98]More like dual blades are the way to go [/quote]

Lol, I second db's, I saw this one lv 200 db that didn't get hit by anything...

Reply November 4, 2012