General

The Evolving Rings aren't never unstackable with each other.

Just If you are curious.
Now time to start on something that I haven't done for a while.

December 23, 2010

9 Comments • Newest first

kratos7777

It seems so...Oh well I have a Lilin next to it and a few zombie rings.
- - - = -

Reply December 23, 2010
reidxsora

i have a lvl 15 ring tradeable someone kill me

Reply December 23, 2010
galeofwind

Aren't never unstackable..? -explodes-

Reply December 23, 2010
YumAlfredo

[quote=11penguin11]Ikr? -stares at title- WTF triple negative. The grammatical equivalent of dividing by 0.[/quote]

Except that triple negative leads to a single negative. Dividing by 0 leads to infinity.

It's more like the grammatical equivalent of multiplying imaginary numbers. ;P

Reply December 23, 2010
11penguin11

Ikr? -stares at title- WTF triple negative. The grammatical equivalent of dividing by 0.

Reply December 23, 2010
OldSnake

ooo update. the 17th and 1st ring are stackable lol

Reply December 23, 2010
sandisku3

It means they're unstackable.

Reply December 23, 2010
Luxuryz

woah confusing thread title!
that's a double negative? maybe a triple? head hurts....
EDIT: @piercemyheart: Y U NINJAH ME?

Reply December 23, 2010 - edited
PierceMyHeart

Triple negative. So:
The Evolving rings are unstable with each other*

Reply December 23, 2010 - edited