A message to people incapable of talking to another
A bit of advice to people in general (you should know if you're one of them or not): When you are talking to someone and want to keep the conversation going, do not ridicule yourself by replying with *just* an idiotic face, "laugh", or "k"; it shows a lack of interest and it makes [the person you're "talking" to] feel unpleasant. Try and at least add a bit of relevance to whichever subject you are having, and if the subject is rubbish, bring up a new one; unless the point of doing that (replying with useless crap for the chat) is to stop the conversation, why not just politely end the chat in an acceptable way? -Does not compute-
Simply put:
Whenever you (person in general) start talking to [the person you're "talking to"] and you do not talk back after you say something like, for example: "how are you, cherished friend I'm dying to talk to but yet do not know how to keep a conversation?", why should I waste my invaluable time talking to you?
/endsermon
5 Comments • Newest first
[quote=MrClean]Sorry, but your post was too distracting with the random usage of parentheses.[/quote]
I wouldn't doubt it, but I thought it was the best way to prevent people of thinking I'm talking about everybody.
[quote=PcPls123]You talk too much[/quote]
[url=http://media.photobucket.com/image/applause%20gif/thebruneitor/memes/applause.gif?o=6]That's great but frankly I don't care whether I express things too much or if I wrote too much for your brain to handle.[/url]
@metaghost3: oh, well yes I suppose so
[quote=xFaceIess]but if you kept bringing new topics up, wouldn't some people find you really weird..
especially if your topics are random.. >__<.[/quote]
Nothing lasts forever, so eventually the conversation will end. And if your topics reach the limit of randomness, I assure you he/she'd either tell you, or leave unexpectedly because of something.
but if you kept bringing new topics up, wouldn't some people find you really weird..
especially if your topics are random.. >__<.