General

VIP 2H Sword vs VIP 2H Axe

Which is better speed wise? I know sword looks better, but I'm just concerned about the speed. Or do they both have the same attack speed?

October 12, 2011

8 Comments • Newest first

Nhil

@ErrorCode:

Oh dam maybe I shouldn't of sold that 2-h Vip Axe for so cheap then rofl.
Oh wells, I hope whoever got it uses it well

Reply October 12, 2011
Ultramantiga

i got a perfecg 172 attack vip 2h axe no star when it was clean it was 127 attack probably one of the highest clean attack q vip 2h axe can get.

Reply October 12, 2011
ErrorCode

[quote=Nhil]The damage formula for axes was always so much worse I thought
I dunno, Stonetooth all day though <3[/quote]

They have had equal formulas since the BB patch.

Reply October 12, 2011
Nhil

The damage formula for axes was always so much worse I thought
I dunno, Stonetooth all day though <3

Reply October 12, 2011
jimmyjxia

Swords are more wanted because they can also be used by paladins. They're more versatile especially when you want to switch your main to a paladin. You don't have to go through the trouble of finding another perfect weapon.

Reply October 12, 2011
Toukie

[quote=brandonie]With them being the same speed I'd definitely get the 2hand VIP axe. It's cheaper to scroll and looks really awesome.[/quote]
Right? D:
I mean, if they're of the exact same speed, it wouldn't matter if you chose Sword or Axe.
I know [i]only[/i] Hero's would benefit from this weapon, but still. Cheaper to buy, to scroll, and it also has a higher base attack.

Poor neglected Axe..

@ElectrikFiSh: And you're very welcome c:
Glad I could help~

Reply October 12, 2011 - edited
ElectrikFiSh

[quote=Toukie]Actually, both VIP Weapons have a speed of Normal (6).
Usually though, Axes tend to be Slow (7), but in this case, they're of the same speed.[/quote]

Thanks for helping me

Reply October 12, 2011 - edited
Toukie

Actually, both VIP Weapons have a speed of Normal (6).
Usually though, Axes tend to be Slow (7), but in this case, they're of the same speed.

Reply October 12, 2011 - edited