General

Mage

bonus magic attack with cards system

Hey guys just wanted to know if that thing really works because in basil it say that
Blaze Wizard give percent magic attack for each level and that Ice Mage give m.att per lvl
here:

Blaze Wizard M.ATK per level +2% +4% (b rank,a rank)
Ice/Lightning M.ATK per level .5 +1 +1.5 +2 (b rank,a rank,s rank,ss rank)

does that mean that if i get a Ice Mage to lvl 70 il get 70 m att?
and does it stack with another Ice Mage and or Blaze Wiz?
Ty everyone

October 31, 2012

4 Comments • Newest first

darkspawn980

[quote=carbunion]The i/l character card bonus is +x magic attack [b]damage[/b] per level. It was mistranslated.

Also there are reports that using the i/l or pally character cards can lead to incorrect damage being shown (I believe it was higher than actual damage dealt).

Anyways hope this helps.[/quote]

fixed, it gives damage, not range, it sucks horribly along with pally card and bucc card

Reply October 31, 2012
GalStilkol

[quote=Arcana27961]BW and I/L cards also have the same effects. The only difference is I/L get a better bonus since they can level to 200.

My I/L gives +1 MAtt range per level so, unless I read wrong, I will receive an extra 194 points to my F/P's range...so yeah, it's not that great of a card. Most character cards are terrible for increasing your range or damage. It's best to use them for defensive buffs.[/quote]
um doesn't it works that u get as much as points as the i/l mage lvl?
and yeah besides the bonus stats the three of a kind it sux lol

Reply October 31, 2012
Arcana27961

BW and I/L cards also have the same effects. The only difference is I/L get a better bonus since they can level to 200.

My I/L gives +1 MAtt range per level so, unless I read wrong, I will receive an extra 194 points to my F/P's range...so yeah, it's not that great of a card. Most character cards are terrible for increasing your range or damage. It's best to use them for defensive buffs.

Reply October 31, 2012
GalStilkol

o now that actually makes sense haha
tyvm

Reply October 31, 2012