Paladins still all about attack?
I know to get a good range, we need a balanced str:att ratio. However, before red patch, we had very few +att skills so that's why paladins always aimed for attack as first priority.
However, with the red patch now and tons of att and total dmg, should aiming for %str be of highest priority instead? (also, does total damage affect the ratio?)
Just wondering
January 9, 2014
7 Comments • Newest first
[quote=slg388]I found this, check the second post:
http://www.basilmarket.com/forum/2627816/0/Perfect_Stat_to_Attack_Ratio.html[/quote]
If that chart keeps going like that I think I need 600% str to stay in the perfect area. I need to start cubing some stuff...
Go for attack first. Make as much attack on each equip as you can. THEN go for %str on them.
It all depends on how much %Str you have. Around 200% Str, 1 attack can add up to 1k on your range.
All depends on your equips.. If its tyrants then aim for a balance if not then split it up a bit, like one piece % and a bit of attack then on another piece attack and a bit of %. Also depends on the piece of equip too
yeah there has to be a balance, but what should paladins' equips be more inclined towards, given the new att we have? still att or %str?
it depends on what you have atm, ideally there's a balance between the two xD
In some cases attack is better than % but aim for both of you can c: