General

[quote=dragon2923]@ItzAlec: Actually, wikipedia is pretty accurate on well known subjects but not so much on subjects that doesn't have much information on it.

But congratulation for repeating what teachers has been saying since wikipedia has been created.

But sure, go on and try to edit a subject, you will most likely not be able to.

Here's a wiki page that explains how the website works and bla bla bla.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

ALSO, if you are dumb enough to only use one source for your whole paper, you're the stupid one.

I also don't get why someone would ask you to write a paper on a subject that is very vague. I mean, kepler 69c is a terrestrial planet and scientific believe that it could host alien life but are not sure about it. All they do is speculate about said planet[/quote]

im not using one source? im using multiple sources lol

@ItzAlec: Actually, wikipedia is pretty accurate on well known subjects but not so much on subjects that doesn't have much information on it.

But congratulation for repeating what teachers has been saying since wikipedia has been created.

But sure, go on and try to edit a subject, you will most likely not be able to.

Here's a wiki page that explains how the website works and bla bla bla.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

ALSO, if you are dumb enough to only use one source for your whole paper, you're the stupid one.

I also don't get why someone would ask you to write a paper on a subject that is very vague. I mean, kepler 69c is a terrestrial planet and scientific believe that it could host alien life but are not sure about it. All they do is speculate about said planet

[quote=dragon2923]google.com
wikipedia.org[/quote]

if u really use wikipedia on a research paper u are pretty stupid

google.com
wikipedia.org