General

@Headsntails:
Thanks for clearing it up.

I'm pretty sure it's just a typo and it's really 0.5/1/1.5/2 PERCENT att/magic.
It would make a lot more sense like that.

[quote=Tokeb]Yeah, but everything changed when the fire nation attacked.[/quote]
He was on a role today, but everything changed when the fire nation attacked.

It must be a typo. For the people saying the level refers to the ranks, that has to be incorrect. The .5/1/1.5/2 correspond to the ranks B/A/S/SS. If it is true, the per level would refer to the level of the character you're using. Say you're on a level 130 and have a level 200 paladin, you would get 260 att. However, this seems overpowered. Nexon either worded it very incorrectly, or it's a typo.

@askmiller: They want to encourage you to make less-played classes? (even if for only til 120 or whatever you aim for)

And they're Nexon, so I didn't expect them to be balanced at all. -shrugs-
I'm just sad that all thieves got all horrible cards since those are my mains. Thought they'd give a %crit or %dodge and I'd be ecstatic, but someone's got to get the short end of the stick.

@askmiller: I thought the exact same thing. Especially with classes like Mechs having 20% buff duration, Drk with 15/20%(?) hp, etc etc.

Better than getting speed, jump, or accuracy though LOL

Only the Avatar, master of all four elements, could stop them, but when the world needed him most, he vanished.

OT: not a typo caca

[quote=Steliome]The +Att per level is apparently card level
i.e : B/A/S/SS
0.5/1/1.5/2[/quote]

Having 0.5/1/1.5/2 [b]per character level [/b] doesn't really make sense with this theory though. It seems very redundant to phrase it this way and simply mean a small, flat attack bonus.

@askmiller: Well it's as abnormal for every assumption of the usage, so it's strange whichever way it goes.

Yeah, 400 att would be seriously game breaking.

Pretty sure by character level they mean by "30, 70, 120, 200" i.e rank B, A, S, SS card

That's why there are 4 ranks of bonus (+0.5/1/1.5/2)