Is Luk needed after Big Bang?
Well, I decided to make an Evan, but I was debating whether or not to go Lukless, or LowLuk because of BB.
I heard that Luk is needed for Magic Acc, and INT no longer plays as big of a role, so should I go Lowluk to have acc after BB, or lukless if I don't even need it.
November 11, 2010
5 Comments • Newest first
I was planning on that anyway, since Evan's use more than one element.
Alright, thanks. I just wanted to know cause that big bang guide we had before said that lukless wasn't the way to go anymore.
Thanks for the insight ^o^
well either way you want to minimize LUK and in most cases you want EWand anyway (if you can afford).
sadly. lukless will not miss like crazy (though i wish they would) go reg luck cause lukless is kinda sad, not to mention kinda expensive due to ele wands
I seriously don't know who's spreading rumors that LUKless will miss like crazy but it's starting to piss me off >.<
new Magic Acc Formula is 1.2*LUK + INT + Acc. Meaning, when a LUKless Mage gets to Lvl 33, it would have 169 or so (or 174 if Job Adv gave 5 AP, forgot) BASE Int, and therefore will be able to hit all monsters under Lvl 160! (not factoring in lvl of course). adding LUK for the sake of acc is WAY overdoing it although you still have to consider being able to get better potential stats since that will (most of the time) outweigh gains from LUKless at higher lvls