General

Would You Rather

[b]EDIT: Hey why don't we just make it so you can move worlds whenever you want. NOT transfer, just select it like a channel.[/b]
Ok, you gotta admit by now that the Maple population has decreased.
There are so many worlds which are just empty, I really don't get how you guys can play on them (I'm a social butterfly).

So anyway, my question is, would you rather keep the worlds as they are,
or
Have 1-2 worlds with lots and lots of channels. FM stores will be replaced with a bulletin board that can be accessed from any channel (like Auction House except you can go on as much as you want and it actually exists) because just imagine channel 1 FM if we were all in 1 world.
Oh and for PQs, if your channel is taken, it auto CCs you. I ain't channel surfing through 200 servers.

List your reasons as well, I really wanna know because I'd like it if worlds merged (and maybe promotion of party play instead of solo grind all day errday)[b][/b][b][/b][b][/b][b][/b]

July 18, 2014

16 Comments • Newest first

Tac0Dit

i liked the idea for visitor pq channel change because it changed the channel for you so i would be alright with that

Reply July 18, 2014
WhileeInSchools

-used to get a map for 2x like a hour and a half prior to the event actually starting- i think 200 channels would be okk! Sounds fun

Reply July 18, 2014
AppleDestroyer

@melonmel:

people still buy a crap ton of NX these days so they are making enough.

Reply July 18, 2014
melonmel

[quote=AppleDestroyer]@melonmel:

if we could freely move between worlds, Nexon wouldn't make any money, which is why we can't.[/quote]

Well they aren't going to get any money soon if people keep quitting at this rate
Why does NexonAmerica not add the good things like mileage and auctionhouse like in KMS? They're ruining the game because they want more money but they're not going to keep making more if players keep quitting.

Tha hell nexon

Reply July 18, 2014
AppleDestroyer

@melonmel:

if we could freely move between worlds, Nexon wouldn't make any money, which is why we can't.

Reply July 18, 2014
melonmel

[quote=AppleDestroyer]@melonmel:

i don't know. i'm in broa and during 2x every channel is pretty much full. but i'm sure there are some worlds that are empty.[/quote]

Yeah exactly! Then those empty channels can be taken by people from fuller servers.

Actually, why don't we just keep everything the way it is but we can freely move between worlds? o__o
I'd like that actually.

Reply July 18, 2014
AppleDestroyer

@melonmel:

i don't know. i'm in broa and during 2x every channel is pretty much full. but i'm sure there are some worlds that are empty.

Reply July 18, 2014
melonmel

[quote=AppleDestroyer]@melonmel:
i'm pretty sure they would still be taken up during 2x events and what not.[/quote]

Hey just wondering, are there worlds that are so empty that you can easily find a room during 2x?
Because that would be good for merging. Then there will be more channels to find a room.

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
AppleDestroyer

@melonmel:

i'm pretty sure they would still be taken up during 2x events and what not.

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
melonmel

[quote=Xaiosun]Honestly, to me its a toss up. I love high population for things like most end game maps ( future perion) But with EVERYONE in the same world, places would be too packed. Think of how many channels are taken for 2x exp now? imagine that x30. Its like for economy purposes it sounds great, otherwise sounds terrible (not to mention dojo. ugh.)[/quote]

All channels are taken for 2X so x30 it would be the same because 30x more channels?
If it was too packed go to channel 147 or something HAHAHA

Dojo could have better prize distribution and different tiers of ranking?

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
Kazzooey

[quote=AppleDestroyer]if we have 1-2 worlds, there would literally be no where to train.[/quote]

Actually there would but people don't 'know how to click the "invite to party" button.

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
melonmel

[quote=AppleDestroyer]if we have 1-2 worlds, there would literally be no where to train.[/quote]

Even with 200 channels? For each world merged, you add 20 channels soooo.... wouldn't that be similar?

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
Xaiosun

Honestly, to me its a toss up. I love high population for things like most end game maps ( future perion) But with EVERYONE in the same world, places would be too packed. Think of how many channels are taken for 2x exp now? imagine that x30. Its like for economy purposes it sounds great, otherwise sounds terrible (not to mention dojo. ugh.)

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
AppleDestroyer

if we have 1-2 worlds, there would literally be no where to train.

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited
xtripled

merge a few, but not all. You people don't want the Scanian Plague.

Reply July 18, 2014 - edited