General

4 Piece Sw and 3 Piece Ra vs Full Sw vs Full Ra

Hey, recently I've come to a bit of a standstill with trying to figure out what would be best for me in the long run in terms of equipment. Heres what I have so far:

Around a 220k range buffed (I have waaaayyy too much att in comparision to %luk; about 1k att buffed vs 50% luk....don't laugh)
A Full SW Set (Gloves, Hat, Overall, Weapon, etc.)
A SW Katara that I transposed (190 att, 55% boss, 25% pdr, 10% luk, epic potential, 7 stars)
A Fafnir Dagger that HASN'T Been transposed yet (286 att, 55% boss, 10% pdr 6% luk, epic potential, 8 stars)

What I'm planning on using now is:

SW Katara
Faf Dagger
SW Cape Transposed with Tyrant
SW Shoes Transposed with Tyrant
SW Hat transposed with new KMS OMGWTF hat
SW Gloves Transposed with Tyrant gloves
RA Top
RA Bottom

I don't normally cube, so I don't have a lot of % Luk vs an outrageous amount of weapon attack in comparison, and I lack unique 30% boss on both of my weapons, but I do have a 25% boss neb to compensate for that. Originally I picked the SW set over RA because I not only got a large amount of attack and stat bonuses, but I could also get an extra 30% boss on top of that. However, with the nature of %Boss itself having diminishing returns, I don't think that past 200% boss it would make much of a difference.

Now up until recently, I was aiming for a full SW set transposed with Tyrants, a scrolled emp overall, and eventually with that new lvl 150 hat in KMS that has like 22 slots. HOWEVER, the more that I think about it, I think that I might benefit more from a 4 piece SW set (gloves, hat, shoes, cape) and a 3 piece RA set (top, bottom, weapon) vs going out Full RA or Full SW. I'm planning on transposing tyrant gloves, cape, and shoes to my SW gear with at least 7-8 stars, as well as using a tyrant thief belt. But i figured that by going with this new setup, the benefit from the use of a top and bottom vs an overall would be better, and that I also get the 50 att from the 3 RA set bonus. Plus, I don't really thing that losing a top and bottom would be worth the 30% boss from the full SW set either. So what do you guys think? Stick with my original plan with full SW, my new plan that mixes both RA and SW, or go full out RA and tyrants.

January 30, 2014

5 Comments • Newest first

Rokani

I think the SW + RA set might be good for you, as % boss is not as important with the more you get as well the extra stats you get should greatly help your range due to your lack of luck. However the amount of info you gave isn't enough to give me a full idea of your set up.

If you want, since you seem really worried about this, why not [url=https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtuZICbMgOQndE00N1hiQWRHTS1UVG9keVhGUkk0NWc&usp=drive_web#gid=0]use this[/url] to calculate the difference in damage output with each set up?

You just have to figure out what stats you would have.

Reply January 30, 2014 - edited
TheBaldAran

@Rokani

Thanks, and good luck on the lab report. Had a paper a couple days ago in western civ that was a pain

Reply January 30, 2014 - edited
Rokani

>.> Dam such negativity lol. I'll think about it and reply tomorrow, >.> Have 7 hours to finish this lab report...

Reply January 30, 2014 - edited
TheBaldAran

*sigh* I knew I picked a bad time for this.

Reply January 30, 2014 - edited
MSmaste

g t f o ITS ALL ABOUT INMATE RITE NOW

Reply January 30, 2014 - edited