9/11 was an inside job
A 767 burns roughly 1 gallon of fuel per second. Let's give one turbine the generous weight of ten thousand pounds. Ten thousand pounds for every gallon per second. There was 200,000 tons of steel, and 2,800,000 lb's of concrete in one WTC tower. Let's be very generous, and cut that in half.
That gives us 20 thousand times the mass of a 767 Turbine (counting just half of the steel, and no concrete).
Jet fuel has a caloric value of 44MJ per kilogram. A fully loaded 767 holds 3,500 gallons, weighs 10,793 kg's, and is equal to 474,920 megajoules of total caloric energy.
100,000 tons of steel weighs 200,000,000 million pounds, or 90,909,009 Kg's. That's 0.0052241247069364 MJ's of energy per kilogram of steel if the fuel burned instantly, which it didn't. Divide by however many seconds you like, it only proves my theory even more.
A 767 turbine (housing included) weighs roughly 10,000 lb's, or 4,535 kg's. Burning roughly a gallon per second, or 3 kg's of jet fuel, and is equal to 132 MJ's of energy. That's 0.0291069459757442 MJ's of energy per kilogram of turbine alloy, per second.
Big difference.
I've left out many different factors that all play out in my favor.
The fuel didn't burn instantly.
The fuel didn't have nearly as much oxygen as a jet turbine.
Most of the fuel burned on impact.
The plane was on a domestic flight, and wasn't even fully loaded with fuel when it left the airport.
Haven't accounted for ANY of the concrete, or half of the steel.
When there is a fire in a steel building. The heat necessary for failure is absolutely impossible. The structure acts as one enormous heat-sink, spreading the heat out from the source in a grid like pattern. It literally get's drawn down the building, dispersed and negated. From the top, down, the bottom floors held the most mass, they had the heaviest beams, and therefore the greatest mass of the entire structure. The heat was literally sucked down, and completely negated. Furthermore, the beams were covered is asbestos. Even if the parts that were struck by the plane lost their protective coatings, all of the other floors didn't, and it still had no effect whatsoever on the steels ability to disperse heat. The larger the tower, the more mass, the less likely for concentrated heat to build. What we are told happened on 9/11 is an absolute sham, as A 130 year old Firefighting magazine said, as well as thousands of industry professionals. And, we haven't even touched on Building 7...
6 Comments • Newest first
In order to prevent forum spam, please continue this discussion in the thread already created on this topic: http://www.basilmarket.com/forum/2711309
Oh well.
@Dunnoenab Nobody wants to hear actual, factual evidence. A nice story was made up to explain it all away, and when that was questioned, a new, slightly different story was made up (pancake, sagging trusses, disappearing fire insulation). Cute animations were produced showing all 100 floors sliding down like a deck of cards and everyone went on to the next new big thing, like American Idol or The Weakest Link.
Besides, this isn't kerosene we're talking about here... "everyone knows" Jet Fuel burns at high enough temperatures to melt anything.
And it burns long enough to take a plane to LA or Japan... what's that.. 4 or 10 hours..? Of course the building melted. "Everyone knows" that.
Anyone who says "wait a minute.. what about..." is branded a kook or conspiracy theorist and subjected to societal distain.
And no one ever looks at it again.
Well if you're from the USA I suggest you leave then?
[quote=foxxman301]I thought that the terrorists hijacked the planes and made them crash into the WTC. But I'm probably wrong that's just how I always understood it.[/quote]
It's physically impossible for a tower to have fallen from that crash. Planes fly at 550 MPH, plus you have air resistance, etc., to calculate in. Something weighing millions of pounds can't be taken down that easily. That's like throwing a toy fire truck at an adult and expecting them to fall over. Many architects, physicists, engineers, etc., have done and confirmed that it was impossible as well.
Plus they hit the top, not the bottom support beams. It's like trying to push someone down (weighing millions of pounds) by ramming into their chest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sm73wOuPL60
I thought that the terrorists hijacked the planes and made them crash into the WTC. But I'm probably wrong that's just how I always understood it.