General

Corsair

New Corsair - Possibly Second Main

As the title may indicate I'm going to make a Corsair and making it as a second main (for now at least)
I'm just wondering what should I expect as in survivability long run and damage out put with basic funding such as a full empress set and then progressing into CRA equips (the cost of CRA isn't an issue they're only like 100m top/bot in bera) also possibly tyrant equips (already got a belt from marvel)
Also, any advice for fast training or means of survivability would be much appreciated

February 20, 2014

4 Comments • Newest first

wolf9891

[quote=beradude4090]Survivability will never be an issue with corsair. At high levels you will easily reach 40k + HP with or without funding. Damage is good as ever with our insanely high% attacks - ELE is 650% x 4. Our mobility is superb with glide and flash jump, the cannoneer jump, as well as backward flash jump that can be spammed 3 times in succession. We are a very capable class and beyond viable in terms of your main.[/quote]

o_0 everything you said sounds about right minus the HP,my god 40k hp+ with or without funding thats doubtful. I have buffed up without dice atleast 33k hp,i'd love to know your secret to having 40k+.

Reply February 21, 2014
FlamyHeavens

They're alright pre 4th and good post 4th
Boat is amazing for DIPQ & Evo

Reply February 20, 2014
BaDdBrOwNiEz

Training is decently fast. If you can get Broadside to hit enough, TP golems die quickly while you move across the map. Survivability isn't really a problem if you can afford Tyrant and CRA. Outside of that, I feel Corsair is a very unique class. The only problem I have with the Corsair is the fact that I want Brain Scrambler to hit more times :[

Oh well!
Enjoy the Corsair, I sure do

Reply February 20, 2014
KamikazeDes

Survivability is amazing. With CRA alone, you'll be more than good to go.
Damage is pretty good. Broadside makes soloing any Gollux form easy, given enough funding.
Pretty fun, and cycling through skills makes them even better.

Reply February 20, 2014