General

[quote=GlobalKorean]@Lamato: so in your opinion would it be better to fund a shadower or a dual blade?[/quote]

From a personal perspective, Shadowers since good Kataras can get really expensive. Then again, anything with a good %att potential will be as expensive so in the end, it all really comes down to which playstyle you like better. Try out a class and go unfunded/semi-funded, then when you have a good grasp of how they play, pick the one you like more and fund it. The good perk in this particular situation is you can job transfer.

@Lamato: so in your opinion would it be better to fund a shadower or a dual blade?

Play anything that's fun to you?

[quote=GlobalKorean]@Lamato:
Sorry to steal your thread here, but why are shadowers considered cheap to fund? Been reading a lot of posts lately about NL vs Shad vs DB and out of all of them it came out as NL being the easiest to fund, then shad, then DB. Ive been trying to fund a DB, but people have been saying thats an impossible task.[/quote]

Shadowers a sort of cheaper to fund since you don't need 10 sets of stars and good Khanjars are generally hard to sell so you might get lucky and get it cheaper (they're still expensive, though). Khanjars are cheaper than Kataras.Daggers are still pretty expensive due to Dual Blades, but thank god they're not as overpriced as claws are. That's basically the only difference.

I personally think that any claw-based class is more expensive solely due to the claw itself. (+stars if you're aiming for the good ones)

@Lamato:
Sorry to steal your thread here, but why are shadowers considered cheap to fund? Been reading a lot of posts lately about NL vs Shad vs DB and out of all of them it came out as NL being the easiest to fund, then shad, then DB. Ive been trying to fund a DB, but people have been saying thats an impossible task.

[quote=aznstyles]Uhh can you stack one specific stat as xenon it potiental % or is all stat better[/quote]

Xenon uses Str, Dex, and Luk as their primary stats. I believe Luk adds more range but Str has better benefits(?). All I know is that %allstat is what potential they should aim for. Having all stats is just an added bonus since they can actually utilize three stats by default. So to answer your question, yes, they can "stack" stats.

edit: To answer OPs question, Arans are good, but they're not the most efficient since they lack lines on their attacks. They hit hard, but not a lot of times. Marksmen are pretty good since they have pierce which is an excellent mobbing attack, snipe, a system where you hit harder/weaker the farther/closer you are from a mob when attacking (not always the best), high crit, high defense (thanks to a 3rd job skill), and many other perks. Also, %dex is cheap so that's a thing.

[quote=Lamato]Marksmen, Shadower, F/P Mage, Zero, Blaze Wizard, and Xenon all come to mind.

Xenon especially since they gain the most from the recent Star Enhancment patch.[/quote]

Uhh can you stack one specific stat as xenon it potiental % or is all stat better

what about an aran? are they any good? and why MM?

Marksmen, Shadower, F/P Mage, Zero, Blaze Wizard, and Xenon all come to mind.

Xenon especially since they gain the most from the recent Star Enhancment patch.

I would suggest MM... with 15 bil funding.. you will be able to get to about 70-80k range......In most classes you will hit like 6.2 mil damage per second but in the case of MM, you will prolly hit like 12 -25 mil per second at bosses.... Well.. thats my opinion....... other options for you are FP mage, Shadower, Shade and Even NW