General

Hero

1hSW or 2hAxeFafnir

Sorry for the double post...
I have a 1h empress sword w/ legendary pot and a 20% boss neb. If I transpose, I get it up to 340attack. (worth going this far with a 1h sword?)
Or
I can buy a cheap perfected/uniquepotted fafnir 2h axe for around 3bil ish... (280ish atk)
Which would be better end-game and won't bother to replace in the future.
Keep in mind that cubes are sorta hard to come by for me
Also if you don't mind, What should I anvil the weapon you choose to?

Thanks!

February 26, 2014

8 Comments • Newest first

samstergx

@its033 you aren't using sw to it's fullest potential then,
1. if you fully upgrade a tyrant (max stats) transpose it to sw, and then perfect that
2. Perfect fafnir transpose then perfect sw
3. you can still use some parts of the tyrant and gollux set
I think you are just thinking sw by itself, or sw clean. I don't think you have realized how godly sw is, and how much potential it can have..

Reply March 1, 2014
lts033

2h+medal is much better than any 1h+shield, unless nexon adjusts damage multiplyer or allow shield and medal to be equipped together.
And @samstergx sw isn't the best set. It's not that great. Fafnir+tyrant+superior/reinforced gollux set is much better.

Reply March 1, 2014
Remicks

[quote=fmonglobal]@samstergx isn't faf equips untradeable after equippimg too?[/quote]

You can PSoK them.

Reply February 26, 2014
Remicks

I'm in the same scenario, I have a 251 Attack Empress 1H Sword with Legendary Pot. I'm thinking of selling it and using the money from that to buy a perfect Fafnir 2H Axe. I'm not too sure how much a perfect Fafnir 2H Axe would be, however.

Reply February 26, 2014
samstergx

@generalstore you have it wrong SW is oner of the best sets you could have, if used properly, only downside is you wont be able to make your money back.

Reply February 26, 2014
GeneralStore

Sell your current sword and buy a fafnir. SW doesn't have much value as an endgame weapon and they are completely untradeable on top of that (once equipped).

Reply February 26, 2014