General

Chat

Emergeny, chemistry help

Hey guys im in gr 11 and i need help in chem
we did a lab and reacted Iron and Copper (ii) sulfate but nothing happened even though iron is higher on the activity series
same with aluminum and copper (ii) sulphate
can anyone please tell me why they didnt react ?

October 20, 2010

7 Comments • Newest first

SinghNinja

kk thnx alot everyone
helped big time

Reply October 20, 2010
SinghNinja

[quote=spring02]When something is oxidized, it means it loses its electrons. generally, metals become oxidized in a reaction as they lose their electrons to the non metal part of the compound. Aznseal has a point where the iron loses its electrons to oxygen. This makes iron become oxidized, and therefore inhibiting its ability to react with other chemicals[/quote]

wooot ok thnx and thnx alot aznseal, but one more thing, the iron fillings looked normal, like they werent rusted
and the answer is the same thing for aluminun right ?

Reply October 20, 2010
aznseal

[quote=SinghNinja]meaning it wont react ?[/quote]

Yeah, because it'll already be "happy"

Reply October 20, 2010
SinghNinja

[quote=aznseal]If it's exposed to O2 for too long, it'll already have been oxidized.[/quote]

meaning it wont react ?

Reply October 20, 2010
aznseal

[quote=SinghNinja]nah the lab is right
teacher said it has something to do with iron being exposed to oxygen too long,
but i still dont know how that causes it not to react with copper (ii) sulfate[/quote]

If it's exposed to O2 for too long, it'll already have been oxidized.

Reply October 20, 2010
SinghNinja

[quote=Sadaxer]... I don't really know. Weird. Is that the point of the lab, or did you make a mistake?
If done correctly, it should...[/quote]

nah the lab is right
teacher said it has something to do with iron being exposed to oxygen too long,
but i still dont know how that causes it not to react with copper (ii) sulfate

Reply October 20, 2010
aznseal

You did the lab wrong.

The reaction should have occurred, producing aqueous FeSO4 and solid Cu

Reply October 20, 2010 - edited