General

[quote=Shroomsly]I think you might be on to something. Wasn't too far off from my idea, either. Counting their own weirdness against them is brilliant. Commas are an odd thing to point out though. In my opinion... My idea would be the worse of the two. Post some more suggestions. Should I then like them... We would then keep them.[/quote]
Nah. Laziness taunts me I'm afraid. And my imagination is lacking. Hassle, it is, and we should just leave the god forsaken Chat Roulette to rot in hell.

@suama: I think you might be on to something. Wasn't too far off from my idea, either. Counting their own weirdness against them is brilliant. Commas are an odd thing to point out though. In my opinion... My idea would be the worse of the two. Post some more suggestions. Should I then like them... We would then keep them.

@Shroomsly: I dunno. Don't think that'd work that well. Know what though? If... We create a site that we pretend is aimed at children so they'd troll the crap out of it on purpose would they take the bait? Are they that stupid? Using their wangs to scar little children for life seems like the thing they'd want to do the most. Commas and punctuation seem to lack with these type of people so maybe a grammar test would help filter these people out. Aswell as the typical spelling errors.

[quote=suama]As much as I love to see a whole load of wang first thing in the morning, think I'll pass.[/quote]

Theory:
You would think by now they'd have some sort of system to filter that stuff out. Know what? You'd need a candidate to screen those kinds of things before they are allowed to use the system. "Love the idea," you say? An obvious response. Eye to video contact is the only way to pick out the weirdos anyway. Full reports would be necessary for each screening. Of course, who's going to do the screening? That is the question. "Sweet!" is not a typical response to being selected for that kind of job. Man I know I wouldn't. Junk jobs like this are always in demand by people down on their luck, though, so no worries.

LOLOL @xxpowersxx

Ill do it, ill be the guy with his pingas out.

@zigen u have a look a like then lol!

@sauma sweet! that makes it easier now there is 3 of us we can do this!

Well if it's not too bad...

I'm the one with BASILMARKET written on my forehead.

@kimay so ur friend is one of those weird peds that belongs in an institute then? Nice

@zigen I SWEAR I JUST SEEN YOU!

I would, but my fetish for old men wankin' it only comes around on Mondays.

@suama i have been on for 2 hours have only seen 2? Its not as bad at this time a lot more girls online although with no cam i get nexted asap lol!

@the3stooges lolol! basil it up ima lol so hard if we find each other. Might as well make my pointless chatroulette night fun

As much as I love to see a whole load of wang first thing in the morning, think I'll pass.

@zigen its actually not that bad been on it for 2 hours and have only been grossed out once if you know what i mean Weirdos need sleep too!

@the3stooges! Then its on woot! im on too

[quote=NoNsensical]Drrrr, does iTouch have chatroulette?
And I'm such a bad influence according to you.[/quote]

You are usually i have seen your comments! Also you might be able to use it. Its a website.

[quote=NoNsensical]Drrrr, does iTouch have chatroulette?
And I'm such a bad influence according to you.[/quote]

Idk it might. It is just a website that people go on and it randomizes who you see. It will be other people on the site. You don't like the person you see you click next. And you are a bad influence! I alwaysss see ur comments lol and theyy are bad!

i would accept your challenge but for some reason i can't close the "accept/deny" popup even though i've been clicking deny.

Drrrr, does iTouch have chatroulette?
And I'm such a bad influence according to you.

lol um you can still use it?