Sw vs Ra Weapon
Considering both are the same attack speed which one is better? They both have the included ignore def and boss dmg. I already hat/top/bott for the RA but nothing for the SW.
Thanks!
February 1, 2014
Sw vs Ra Weapon
Considering both are the same attack speed which one is better? They both have the included ignore def and boss dmg. I already hat/top/bott for the RA but nothing for the SW.
Thanks!
10 Comments • Newest first
Fafnir is better if you have 3b+ to buy the weapons in the first place. If you can't afford the weapons then just stick with SW as it's a cheap alternative. 3 piece RA is good enough for the 50 attack bonus. Obviously if you can afford 3b+ weapons then go with fafnir.
fafnir is better because you can also use tyrant equips.
RA and SW both give 30% boss on their weapons. i would get RA to finish the set.
Root abyss if you're not a thief.
sw if you can afford most of the set
You should state what job you are because even though everyone here says RA equips are worth it/cheaper, if the weapon you need is a Fafnir Damacus, you're gonna have to cough up blood for the money and search for a needle in a haystack to find one.
[quote=ZetsubouMark]If you are planning to use it as an end-game weapon; you would benefit from the RA weapon; rather the SW weapon. The RA 4 set effect gives you an additional 30% boss damage, with your already 30% boss damage just by equipping the weapon.[/quote]
Jesus Crust all of those unnecessary semicolons.
RA is much cheaper right now, you get more for fewer equips, 30% boss <3, and only the weapons are expensive(and deflating a ton)
+ if you already have the 3 set for RA< definitely do RA
RA because the set effect. An extra 30% Boss is nothing to laugh at.
Plus, SW is completely untradeable after equipping.
ra weapon is better b/c of the tradeability
sw is only good if you have at least 4 set.
ra for the 30% extra boss dmg
Fafnirs have 10 slots (hammered) and SW has 9 slots (hammered).