Thieves are for losers
Losers who rely on luck during battle rather than strength, skill, and endurance.
You should be ashamed.
May 14, 2014
Thieves are for losers
Losers who rely on luck during battle rather than strength, skill, and endurance.
You should be ashamed.
29 Comments • Newest first
Thieves are bad people, they steal and I don't like them.
@FruityCake: They changed it you lose the same amount of exp regardless of luck
Why are people still commenting on this
[quote=Xploithero]theyre all dead as well[/quote]
But they lost less Exp.
Due to LUK.
Who needs Strength, Intelligence, and Dexterity?
We have Luck.
Luck = all scrolls succeed, all crits at max crit damage, always max damage, all items 100% drop rate.
Dunno bout you guys...
Back then, warriors (paladins) added INT because their charges were magic based..
Smart Warriors ftw!
This coming from the dexless sword wielder?
K that makes you a loser cuz you play a game based on RNG.
[quote=skittlexz]@gatotsuwolf: Oh yea, I forgot that I already took your stuff...[/quote]
Can you give it back please? I'm sure they're hardly worth a thing now. T__T ((
@gatotsuwolf: Oh yea, I forgot that I already took your stuff...
[quote=skittlexz]Lol this guy is stupid. Ima rob you of everything you own [/quote]
You'll be disappointed, I have nothing left for you to take..
The Chinese hackers got me 2 years ago, they took everything but the untradeables.
*Tried to link a picture to my character in present day, but the link contained the shortened, derogatory term for gay.*
[quote=gatotsuwolf]Losers who rely on luck during battle rather than strength, skill, and endurance.
You should be ashamed.[/quote]
Lol this guy is stupid. Ima rob you of everything you own
[quote=BoredAF]@gatotsuwolf: Maybe you've been lucky to get loosely tightened caps =p[/quote]
I.. I failed to open one today on my first try, it took 30 seconds. Strength has failed me.
Luck isn't going to throw that star at my enemies now is it?
[quote=gatotsuwolf]Hey I didn't want to put that much effort into it, okay. Those who rely on luck don't deserve much of my time.
I can open the cap on bottles on my first attempt. 100% success rate so there can't be any luck involved.
They are, it must be because they're butthurt that they're losers who rely on luck.[/quote]
Doesn't everything rely on luck(probability)? There's a chance that you could fall and stab yourself while swinging your hefty swords bad luck, but luck in general. So show me one strong, brute warrior that didn't ever rely on luck.
[quote=iDivideZer0]"strength, skill, and endurance"
Apparently brains (INT) aren't needed either, seems quite apparent in the this post itself too...[/quote]
Hey I didn't want to put that much effort into it, okay. Those who rely on luck don't deserve much of my time.
[quote=BoredAF]But how strong are you in real life?[/quote]
I can open the cap on bottles on my first attempt. 100% success rate so there can't be any luck involved.
[quote=CherryTigers]Some people are taking this thread a little too seriously but I must admit, it was interesting to read.[/quote]
They are, it must be because they're butthurt that they're losers who rely on luck.
Why are people talking about INT?
Thieves don't use INT...
i have well over 4000 dex and around 3000 str
Some people are taking this thread a little too seriously but I must admit, it was interesting to read.
I said luck too many times and now it sounds funny
I don't think thieves rely on luck anymore, the way avoid works sucks now. I usually have to rely on skills like Shadow Shifter, Meso Guard and Boomerang Step during battle.
Well, we're supposed to be Skill, Stealth, and Speed. Also, a luckless Warrior is a dead Warrior. Same goes for anything else.
@Obstracity:
Leonidas:
Persian Navy destroyed by storms twice. Providing him and his allies time to form an effective army. LUK
Was a third son, so received military training that his brothers had not. LUK
Only used soldiers with sons that could replace their dead parents. INT
Hanibal:
Defeated the Romans for over 20 years with mostly inferior forces by exploiting military weaknesses. INT
Had miraculously survived crossing the Alps with much of his army. LUK
Napolean:
Completely revolutionized warfare with his uses of Artillery and Cavalry. INT
Would regularly charge blindly in hopes of breaking formations out of pure fear. LUK
Julius Caesar:
Spared the lives of enemy leaders to parade them in Rome as trophies to gain support from the senate and the people. INT
Attacked Gaul under the guise of defense of a weak tribe in order to gain popular support from the other tribes. INT
George Washington:
Crossed the Delaware in a last dish effort to gain morale for his cause just as his army was about to be discharged. Found thousands of drunk and sleeping troops that resulted in the most significant victory of the American Revolution. LUK
Alexander the Great:
Revolutionized the use of the traditional phalanx with cavalry that allowed him to defeat forces that outnumbered him 2-1 or even 3-1. INT
Incorporated conquered lands into his empire as equals. INT
Robert E. Lee:
The greatest general of the American Civil War, and would have likely won the war if attrition wasn't the deciding factor. Consistently defeated the northern armies even with inferior equipment, manpower, and supplies. INT
Was known to trust his generals to a great extent. Used Stonewall Jackson countless times to cover retreats and lead attacks that should have failed. LUK
[quote=scorpio989]Sun Tzu
King Leonidas
Hannibal
Napoleon
Julius Caesar
George Washington
Genghis Khan
Alexander the Great
Robert E. Lee
These men would disagree with you. STR is nothing without INT and LUK.[/quote]
Are you trying to sound smart or something? It really wasn't that necessary to include as many pastime heroes as you could think of for your argument
[quote=scorpio989]Sun Tzu
King Leonidas
Hannibal
Napoleon
Julius Caesar
George Washington
Genghis Khan
Alexander the Great
Robert E. Lee
These men would disagree with you. STR is nothing without INT and LUK.[/quote]
theyre all dead as well
Sun Tzu
King Leonidas
Hannibal
Napoleon
Julius Caesar
George Washington
Genghis Khan
Alexander the Great
Robert E. Lee
These men would disagree with you. STR is nothing without INT and LUK.
hey, you're luky I don't know where you live. how dare you call me a loser
"strength, skill, and endurance"
Apparently brains (INT) aren't needed either, seems quite apparent in the this post itself too...
Hey I didn't die. Must be my LUK
that because nexon wanted four classes each with a different stat. And nexon isn't really creative so luk is the best they could come up with