would you rather be?
uhmm so i wanna try get this game going but, basically you answer the persons would you rather question and then ask one for the person below or next person...anyhow
would you rather be dumb and fit, very unhealthy physically but smart
so if you were to survive in this world, you would need to be smart to get a job (unless you get famous or win the lotto or something), and if you were the second option, you could suffer a lot of diseases and could possibly be obese disabling your mobility
October 20, 2014
15 Comments • Newest first
[quote=taotapp]Unhealthy physically, but smart. With enough time and dedication, I could lose weight and be back to my regular self. That is, assuming the "very unhealthy" doesn't also come with genetic maladies that would plague me for the rest of my life. If that's the case, I'd pick dumb and fit, because with a lot of time you can even fix dumb.
Would you rather be rich and forever alone, or poor with a caring spouse who stands by you no matter what?[/quote]
I'd rather be the poorest person in the world than to be forever alone
physical but dumb as long as you got a particular talent or perk you can still find a way to make it in the world
that moment when someone answers a question but doesnt ask one...
would you rather listen to a girl talk about another girl she hates, or listen to go shopping with them :~ o.o o.o
@fakestories ask them if they would want to know when they die, then tell them if they say yes, etc.
the one that gets more girls
they wouldn't be in love with me if they were stuck on their ex. let them go
you find out your best friend/fam member/whatever only has a few months left to live, and they have no way of finding out unless you tell them. keep quiet or naw?
[quote=ZombieOverlord]bj from charmander
[b]Everyone that wants to answer this is free to answer, just quote if possible so we know what you're responding to.[/b]
You're controlling a subway train from a booth, but problem is the train has derailed, putting the 100 passengers on board at risk for a major catastrophe, but there is a solution to save them. There is a manual lever that would help stabilize the train and save the passengers, problem is, you cannot do it as you need to stay in the booth, so the person with you that day, the person you love most, is the closest one to the lever. If He/She/It went to go to the manual lever, they would be able to stabilize the train and save all 100 passengers, problem is, said love one would die from the resulting collision with the subway train.
Dilemma:
Would you rather save the 100 passengers(all strangers) on the subway train by sacrificing your loved one, or let the 100 passengers die and not sacrifice your loved one?[/quote]
either way it's really selfish to put your own love to save a buncha people and vise versa
ideally I'd inform my love of the situation and ask their opinion then go on with it. The flaw in this dilemma is being a couple is about making a two-person decision so you can't forcibly make decisions alone. I would probably save the strangers if my love was inclined to pull the switch.
Dilemmers:
Your gf/bf loves being with you and is in love with you.. but you notice they're still stuck on their ex from time to time. Do you try to win them over or let them go for the chance they might be happier?
bj from charmander
[b]Everyone that wants to answer this is free to answer, just quote if possible so we know what you're responding to.[/b]
You're controlling a subway train from a booth, but problem is the train has derailed, putting the 100 passengers on board at risk for a major catastrophe, but there is a solution to save them. There is a manual lever that would help stabilize the train and save the passengers, problem is, you cannot do it as you need to stay in the booth, so the person with you that day, the person you love most, is the closest one to the lever. If He/She/It went to go to the manual lever, they would be able to stabilize the train and save all 100 passengers, problem is, said love one would die from the resulting collision with the subway train.
Dilemma:
Would you rather save the 100 passengers(all strangers) on the subway train by sacrificing your loved one, or let the 100 passengers die and not sacrifice your loved one?
Go in the future and meet my great great grandchildren.
Would you rather get a bj from charmander or a hj from geodude?
Get shot in the arm. No worse pain than being severely sick for days, I'll get over the shot within the hour.
Would you rather go back in time and meet your ancestors or to the future and meet your great great grandchildren?
A great artist since I don't really care for sports.
Would you rather eat something that would cause an almost lethal reaction (keep in mind you won't die) or get shot by a pistol in the arm?
Clean a latrine. My god, I wouldn't want to risk all those bee-stings >_<
Would you rather be a great athlete or a great artist?
How is that even a dilemma? Two close friends.
Would you rather clean a latrine or poke a beehive without protective gear?
I would be poor and have a caring spouse. When you say poor, hope you don't mean below or right next to poverty line. If so, then I'd be rich and forever alone.
Would you rather have a lot of friends who you could talk too but not that close, or have 2 close friends?
Unhealthy physically, but smart. With enough time and dedication, I could lose weight and be back to my regular self. That is, assuming the "very unhealthy" doesn't also come with genetic maladies that would plague me for the rest of my life. If that's the case, I'd pick dumb and fit, because with a lot of time you can even fix dumb.
Would you rather be rich and forever alone, or poor with a caring spouse who stands by you no matter what?